- President James Madison
The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) just released a deeply flawed report on “illegal immigration” that focused only on Hispanics to the exclusion of all other groups. Its rationale is that young Hispanics immigrants can be seen as the “likely illegal immigrant population.”
Imagine if crime statistics were similarly restricted to one race or ethnic extraction—the so-called study would be laughed at by all serious observers. But such dubious reports are treated as contributions to the immigration debate.
CIS suggests that there has been an 11 percent decline in the undocumented immigrant population as a result of stepped-up enforcement efforts, which are helped by an imploding economy.
This may or may not be the case. But what is more interesting is that CIS decided to simply collapse enforcement and a decline in the undocumented population with Hispanics. So the message here is that Hispanic communities are “likely” pools of law breakers that should be targeted with punitive policies.
As the Immigration Policy Institute counters, most immigration is shaped by survival economics, not political enforcement policies. It cites the downturn in the construction sector as a factor in why less skilled—not less valuable— workers may be leaving.
Never mind that this recession will not last forever. And as the Essential Worker Coalition has warned, the aging baby boomer generation means the need for more workers.
Like other short-sighted, one-dimensional, and fear-based analysis, the CIS report does nothing to move us closer to immigration reform that makes sense for this nation.
Posted on Thursday, July 31 | 0 comments | Permalink
How secure is the border? The opinion of government optimists is that it is way secure. So secure you wouldn’t believe it — and not as secure as it will be.
That is the least the country should expect after all it has given up to lock the border down. Billions of dollars since the 1980s in fencing, razor wire, electronic sensors and vehicle barriers. A major deployment of 6,000 National Guard troops in 2006, to bolster the Border Patrol. The trashing of the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Water Act and a host of environmental and land-management laws. (When Congress ordered the homeland security secretary, Michael Chertoff, to build 670 miles of border fence by the end of this year, it decreed that no law or judge, no wild creature or endangered homeowner, should stop him. Last month, the Supreme Court declined to intervene in one of the many legal disputes the fence has provoked.)
The National Guard is leaving the border at the end of the month. And even though the border states want them to stay, the Bush administration is declaring victory. That’s how good things are down there.
Too bad, though, that the results that restrictionists predict from victory — an end to illegal immigration, the expulsion of illegal immigrants, the restoration of jobs to American workers, the protection of American culture and language from a Hispanic invasion — are not coming anytime soon. That’s because fixing immigration has very little to do with any of the hustle and bustle along the 2,000-mile line from San Diego to Brownsville, Tex.
The Center for Comparative Immigration Studies at the University of California, San Diego, recently did the radical thing of talking to border-crossers about why and how they come. In a survey of undocumented immigrants from four Mexican states, it found that fewer than half are caught by the Border Patrol. Those who fail the first time try again and again, and their success rates for entering the country hover consistently above 90 percent. Sheriffs, police officers and elected officials in border communities — some of whom have ridiculed the fence and sued to block it — would readily confirm that.
The study offered another compelling example of enforcement gone awry: reports that illegal immigrants who are stymied by a tighter border are staying put, setting down roots and bringing their families over.
This is not to argue for giving up on enforcement. The real victory will come when a repaired, well-patrolled border coincides with a repaired, well-run immigration system that requires undocumented workers to come forward and be legalized, has expanded avenues for legal workers, including would-be citizens, and cracks down on illegal hiring as staunchly as it protects workers’ rights.
There is a long list of things to do to make the immigration system correspond to American values and economic realities, and the country is doing just about none of them. We’re paying a huge price to pay for an ineffective fence and some symbolic victories on the border.
Posted on Tuesday, July 08 | 0 comments | Permalink
Posted on Thursday, June 05 | 0 comments | Permalink
Posted on Tuesday, June 03 | 0 comments | Permalink
It is something that hasn't been done enough in movies. Immigration has been all over the news the past couple years, but it has been largely avoided by Hollywood - perhaps its a fear of making people uncomfortable and thefore hurting sales a la Stop-Loss or any other Iraq War movies.
But regardless there is a new film out called The Visitor that takes on many of the problems of our immigration system. According to Entertainment Weekly, "The harsh inequities and Kafka-country miseries of secretive U.S. immigration procedures in a post-9/11 state of anxiety and suspicion shift The Visitor from dream to nightmare." Looks like its going to be a limited New York/LA release for now, but hopefully it will do well enough to go elsewhere.
As a sidenote, Immigrants' List member Cheryl David was the immigration consultant on the film.
Posted on Friday, April 11 | 0 comments | Permalink
To put it in context, that's just $10 Billion more than a year of universal health care according to a report on Presidential Candidate Barack Obama's Health Care proposal.
The Congressional Budget Office Report gets even scarier when you look at where that $40 billion dollars comes from. Over $17 billion of it comes from lost taxes over the course of the next 10 years.
According to the CBO, the $1.73 billion dollars a year will be gone because the immigrant workers who are paying taxes now would be moved underground. The report is essentially admitting that the SAVE Act would not end the employment of illegal immigrants, it would instead move them further off the books and cost the US more money.
Unless the US does something about the pool of legal workers, we can never expect an enforcement-only solution to fix our problem.
Posted on Tuesday, April 08 | 0 comments | Permalink
Posted on Tuesday, April 01 | 0 comments | Permalink
Here's a Politico Report on John McCain admitting that the harsh immigration rhetoric has hurt the party. He brings up the Hastert seat and the Santorum seat, but probably had to look no further than his own Republican Presidential Primary - where candidates like Tancredo, Hunter, and Romney failed- to make the point.
Here's the Original NPR Report:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=88382489
Posted on Tuesday, March 18 | 0 comments | Permalink